Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Loder Loder AT1 and Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 appear in 5 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Loder Loder AT1 performs. It takes the win in snow, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 1 test.
How the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 4 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Loder Loder AT1 still wins on snow, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Choose Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Loder Loder AT1 | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | All Terrain | All Terrain |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 1 | 4 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 4.2 | 4.9 |
| Latest test | — | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 82.4 | 84.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Loder Loder AT1
Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Loder Loder AT1 | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 5.2 1 | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.5 | Avg rank 4.5 11 | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 2.3 21 | Avg rank 5.5 11 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 3.3 21 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 5.0 | Avg rank 2.0 2 | Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 |
💧 Wet: Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to 6.0 for the Loder Loder AT1.
☀️ Dry: Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 6.5 for the Loder Loder AT1.
❄️ Snow: Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 2.3, compared to 5.5 for the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 3.3 for the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015.
🔋 Efficiency: Loder Loder AT1 vs Yokohama Geolandar AT G015
The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to 5.0 for the Loder Loder AT1.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Loder Loder AT1 or Yokohama Geolandar AT G015?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 ranks higher on average than the Loder Loder AT1.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Loder Loder AT1 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Loder Loder AT1 ranks better than the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Loder Loder AT1 appears in 1 independent tests, Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 in 4.
Also compare
Loder Loder AT1 vs…
Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
