Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho Road Venture AT52 and Loder Loder AT1 appear in 2 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Kumho Road Venture AT52 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 1 test.
How the Loder Loder AT1 performs. It takes the win in snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 1 test.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Road Venture AT52 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Loder Loder AT1 still wins on snow, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Kumho Road Venture AT52 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Kumho Road Venture AT52 | Loder Loder AT1 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | All Terrain | All Terrain |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 1 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 2.9 | 4.2 |
| Latest test | — | — |
| Tire Lab Score | 88.4 | 82.4 |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho Road Venture AT52
Loder Loder AT1
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Kumho Road Venture AT52 | Loder Loder AT1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 2.7 11 | Avg rank 6.0 | Kumho Road Venture AT52 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 2.7 11 | Avg rank 6.5 | Kumho Road Venture AT52 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.0 11 | Avg rank 2.3 21 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 3.7 1 | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 5.0 | Loder Loder AT1 |
💧 Wet: Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1
The Kumho Road Venture AT52 wins this category with an average rank of 2.7, compared to 6.0 for the Loder Loder AT1.
☀️ Dry: Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1
The Kumho Road Venture AT52 wins this category with an average rank of 2.7, compared to 6.5 for the Loder Loder AT1.
❄️ Snow: Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 2.3, compared to 3.0 for the Kumho Road Venture AT52.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 3.7 for the Kumho Road Venture AT52.
🔋 Efficiency: Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to no data for the Kumho Road Venture AT52.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Kumho Road Venture AT52 or Loder Loder AT1?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Kumho Road Venture AT52 ranks higher on average than the Loder Loder AT1.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Road Venture AT52 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Loder Loder AT1 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Loder Loder AT1 ranks better than the Kumho Road Venture AT52.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Kumho Road Venture AT52 appears in 1 independent tests, Loder Loder AT1 in 1.
Also compare
Kumho Road Venture AT52 vs…
Loder Loder AT1 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
