BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA and Loder Loder AT1 appear in 4 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA performs. It takes the win in wet. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Loder Loder AT1 performs. It takes the win in dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 1 test.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Loder Loder AT1 still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | Loder Loder AT1 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | All Terrain | All Terrain |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 3 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Latest test | 2025 | — |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.6 | 82.4 |
Tire Lab Score
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA
Loder Loder AT1
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | Loder Loder AT1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.5 12 | Avg rank 6.0 | BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 7.0 1 | Avg rank 6.5 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 5.5 21 | Avg rank 2.3 21 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 4.3 2 | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Loder Loder AT1 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 5.0 | Loder Loder AT1 |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1
The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to 6.0 for the Loder Loder AT1.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to 7.0 for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 2.3, compared to 5.5 for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 4.3 for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Loder Loder AT1
The Loder Loder AT1 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 6.0 for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA or Loder Loder AT1?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA ranks higher on average than the Loder Loder AT1.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Loder Loder AT1 averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Loder Loder AT1 ranks better than the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA appears in 3 independent tests, Loder Loder AT1 in 1.
Also compare
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs…
Loder Loder AT1 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →