Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    2026 test data · 26 independent tests · 3 head-to-head

    → See full Kleber vs Kumho brand comparison

    Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71 appear in 26 tests, 3 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Kleber Krisalp HP3 performs. It takes the win in snow, ice. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 89/100, based on 20 tests.

    How the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 6 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Kleber Krisalp HP3 still wins on snow, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise ice
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise noise / comfort

    Test profile

    MetricKleber Krisalp HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    SegmentWinterWinter
    TypeWinterWinter
    Tests used206
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank10.29.1
    Latest test20252019
    Tire Lab Score89.290.6

    Tire Lab Score

    89.2
    Very Good · Winter
    90.6
    Excellent · Winter

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryKleber Krisalp HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP71Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 11.0
    2
    Avg rank 8.4
    Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 11.8
    1
    Avg rank 9.0
    21
    Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 5.1
    776
    Avg rank 10.0
    11
    Kleber Krisalp HP3
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 15.5
    No data
    Kleber Krisalp HP3
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 10.2
    141
    Avg rank 7.7
    11
    Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 13.2
    Avg rank 12.5
    Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 8.3
    1
    Avg rank 6.0
    2
    Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 3 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 wins this category with an average rank of 8.4, compared to 11.0 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    ☀️ Dry: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 wins this category with an average rank of 9.0, compared to 11.8 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    ❄️ Snow: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kleber Krisalp HP3 wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 10.0 for the Kumho WinterCraft WP71.

    🧊 Ice: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kleber Krisalp HP3 wins this category with an average rank of 15.5, compared to no data for the Kumho WinterCraft WP71.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 wins this category with an average rank of 7.7, compared to 10.2 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    📏 Mileage: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 wins this category with an average rank of 12.5, compared to 13.2 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    🔋 Efficiency: Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 8.3 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Kleber Krisalp HP3 or Kumho WinterCraft WP71?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ranks higher on average than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kleber Krisalp HP3 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ranks better than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 shows better mileage performance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Kleber Krisalp HP3 appears in 20 independent tests, Kumho WinterCraft WP71 in 6, with 3 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →