Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 appear in 12 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 9 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise efficiency
Choose Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Nordic Winter | Nordic Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 3 | 9 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 7.5 | 4.5 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.3 | 88.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.0 1 | Avg rank 5.2 113 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.8 1 | Avg rank 3.9 413 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 7.5 | Avg rank 4.5 253 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 8.4 2 | Avg rank 4.9 51 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 6.0 1 | Avg rank 3.3 512 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 5.0 | Avg rank 6.4 | Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:
💧 Wet: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to 9.0 for the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
☀️ Dry: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 wins this category with an average rank of 3.9, compared to 6.8 for the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
❄️ Snow: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 7.5 for the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
🧊 Ice: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 wins this category with an average rank of 4.9, compared to 8.4 for the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 6.0 for the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
🔋 Efficiency: Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 6.4 for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 or Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 ranks higher on average than the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 ranks better than the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 appears in 3 independent tests, Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 in 9, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs…
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →