BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus appear in 12 tests, 4 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 6 tests.
How the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in noise / comfort and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Choose Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus if
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 6 | 6 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 8.4 | 10.0 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.5 | 88.1 |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.5 11 | Avg rank 11.0 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.3 1 | Avg rank 11.9 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.6 121 | Avg rank 7.3 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 7.0 | Avg rank 7.0 | Tie |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 8.9 | Avg rank 7.5 11 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.8 | Avg rank 7.0 11 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 11.8 | Avg rank 5.7 2 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 4 independent tests:
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 9.5, compared to 11.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to 11.9 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 3.6, compared to 7.3 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Both tires perform similarly in ice, with average ranks of 7.0 and 7.0.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.5, compared to 8.9 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to 10.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 11.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich Advantage All Season or Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season ranks higher on average than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus ranks better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season appears in 6 independent tests, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus in 6, with 4 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs…
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →