Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact and Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus appear in 35 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
How the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental AllSeasonContact is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Continental AllSeasonContact | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 29 | 6 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.4 | 10.0 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 89.6 | 88.1 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Avg rank 11.0 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 7.1 152 | Avg rank 11.9 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | Avg rank 7.3 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 1.3 21 | Avg rank 7.0 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.8 267 | Avg rank 7.5 11 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.7 1 | Avg rank 7.0 11 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.6 1 | Avg rank 5.7 2 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:
💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 11.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 7.1, compared to 11.9 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 7.3 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to 7.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 7.5 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 7.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 8.6 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact or Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental AllSeasonContact averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact shows better mileage performance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental AllSeasonContact appears in 29 independent tests, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus in 6, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →