BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Continental AllSeasonContact appear in 35 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season performs. It takes the win in dry. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 6 tests.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental AllSeasonContact is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise dry
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Continental AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 6 | 29 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 8.4 | 5.4 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.5 | 89.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Continental AllSeasonContact | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.5 11 | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.3 1 | Avg rank 7.1 152 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.6 121 | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 7.0 | Avg rank 1.3 21 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 8.9 | Avg rank 5.8 267 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.8 | Avg rank 6.7 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 11.8 | Avg rank 8.6 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 9.5 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to 7.1 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 3.6 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to 7.0 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 8.9 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 10.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 8.6, compared to 11.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich Advantage All Season or Continental AllSeasonContact?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental AllSeasonContact across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season appears in 6 independent tests, Continental AllSeasonContact in 29.
Also compare
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs…
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →