TopTire Review

    Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    2026 test data · 47 independent tests · 16 head-to-head

    → See full Continental vs Falken brand comparison

    Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact and Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 appear in 47 tests, 16 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.

    How the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 performs. It takes the win in mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 18 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in mileage and Tire Lab Score. The Continental AllSeasonContact still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    Choose Continental AllSeasonContact if

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Choose Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 if

    Overall winner
    • You prioritise mileage
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Test profile

    MetricContinental AllSeasonContactFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used2918
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank5.47.3
    Latest test20242024
    Tire Lab Score89.689.9

    Tire Lab Score

    89.6
    Very Good · All Season
    89.9
    Very Good · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryContinental AllSeasonContactFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 5.1
    6109
    Avg rank 7.0
    35
    Continental AllSeasonContact
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 7.1
    152
    Avg rank 7.5
    22
    Continental AllSeasonContact
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 3.2
    14169
    Avg rank 7.4
    5
    Continental AllSeasonContact
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 1.3
    21
    Avg rank 12.0
    Continental AllSeasonContact
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 5.8
    267
    Avg rank 6.4
    723
    Continental AllSeasonContact
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 6.7
    1
    Avg rank 6.1
    1
    Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 8.6
    1
    Avg rank 2.8
    534
    Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 16 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 7.0 for the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    ☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 7.1, compared to 7.5 for the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    ❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 7.4 for the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to 12.0 for the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 6.4 for the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 wins this category with an average rank of 6.1, compared to 6.7 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.

    🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

    The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 wins this category with an average rank of 2.8, compared to 8.6 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact or Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental AllSeasonContact averages a better dry-braking rank than the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 shows better mileage performance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Continental AllSeasonContact appears in 29 independent tests, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 in 18, with 16 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →