Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Power Cup Evo: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Michelin Power Cup Evo appear in 17 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 16 tests.
How the Michelin Power Cup Evo performs. It takes the win in dry. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Michelin Power Cup Evo are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise efficiency
- You prioritise dry
Test profile
| Metric | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UUHP/Track | UUHP/Track |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 16 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 4.7 | 3.0 |
| Latest test | 2026 | 2020 |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.4 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Michelin Power Cup Evo
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Michelin Power Cup Evo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 4.5 5412 | No data | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.8 76 | Avg rank 1.0 1 | Michelin Power Cup Evo |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.2 831 | No data | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 2.9 721 | No data | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport |
💧 Wet: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Power Cup Evo
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to no data for the Michelin Power Cup Evo.
☀️ Dry: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Power Cup Evo
The Michelin Power Cup Evo wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 4.8 for the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Power Cup Evo
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to no data for the Michelin Power Cup Evo.
🔋 Efficiency: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Power Cup Evo
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 2.9, compared to no data for the Michelin Power Cup Evo.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport or Michelin Power Cup Evo?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport ranks higher on average than the Michelin Power Cup Evo.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Michelin Power Cup Evo averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport ranks better than the Michelin Power Cup Evo.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport appears in 16 independent tests, Michelin Power Cup Evo in 1.
Also compare
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs…
Michelin Power Cup Evo vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
