Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    2026 test data · 7 independent tests · 1 head-to-head

    → See full Goodride vs Radar brand comparison

    Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodride Z507 and Radar Dimax Alpine appear in 7 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Goodride Z507 performs. It takes the win in wet. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    How the Radar Dimax Alpine performs. It takes the win in dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Goodride Z507 and Radar Dimax Alpine are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise noise / comfort

    Test profile

    MetricGoodride Z507Radar Dimax Alpine
    SegmentTouring WinterTouring Winter
    TypeWinterWinter
    Tests used16
    Best rank#14#1
    Avg rank21.817.0
    Latest test20202024
    Tire Lab Score87.9

    Tire Lab Score

    No score yet
    87.9
    Very Good · Winter

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryGoodride Z507Radar Dimax AlpineWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 14.0
    Avg rank 23.4
    Goodride Z507
    ☀️DryNo data
    Avg rank 6.5
    Radar Dimax Alpine
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 27.0
    Avg rank 7.2
    111
    Radar Dimax Alpine
    🔇Noise / ComfortNo data
    Avg rank 5.5
    1
    Radar Dimax Alpine
    🔋EfficiencyNo data
    Avg rank 1.0
    1
    Radar Dimax Alpine

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:

    💧 Wet: Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    The Goodride Z507 wins this category with an average rank of 14.0, compared to 23.4 for the Radar Dimax Alpine.

    ☀️ Dry: Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    ❄️ Snow: Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 7.2, compared to 27.0 for the Goodride Z507.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    🔋 Efficiency: Goodride Z507 vs Radar Dimax Alpine

    The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Goodride Z507 or Radar Dimax Alpine?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodride Z507 ranks higher on average than the Radar Dimax Alpine.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Radar Dimax Alpine averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodride Z507 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Radar Dimax Alpine ranks better than the Goodride Z507.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Goodride Z507 appears in 1 independent tests, Radar Dimax Alpine in 6, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →