Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    2026 test data · 6 independent tests

    → See full Goodride vs Michelin brand comparison

    Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodride Z507 and Michelin Alpin 7 appear in 6 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Goodride Z507 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    How the Michelin Alpin 7 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 5 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Goodride Z507 and Michelin Alpin 7 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prefer the Goodride Z507's brand, sizing or price
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Test profile

    MetricGoodride Z507Michelin Alpin 7
    SegmentTouring WinterTouring Winter
    TypeWinterWinter
    Tests used15
    Best rank#14#1
    Avg rank21.84.6
    Latest test20202025
    Tire Lab Score90.4

    Tire Lab Score

    No score yet
    90.4
    Excellent · Winter

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryGoodride Z507Michelin Alpin 7Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 14.0
    Avg rank 5.5
    112
    Michelin Alpin 7
    ☀️DryNo data
    Avg rank 4.4
    122
    Michelin Alpin 7
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 27.0
    Avg rank 4.5
    23
    Michelin Alpin 7
    🔇Noise / ComfortNo data
    Avg rank 4.1
    35
    Michelin Alpin 7
    🔋EfficiencyNo data
    Avg rank 8.2
    Michelin Alpin 7

    💧 Wet: Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to 14.0 for the Goodride Z507.

    ☀️ Dry: Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    ❄️ Snow: Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 27.0 for the Goodride Z507.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.1, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    🔋 Efficiency: Goodride Z507 vs Michelin Alpin 7

    The Michelin Alpin 7 wins this category with an average rank of 8.2, compared to no data for the Goodride Z507.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Goodride Z507 or Michelin Alpin 7?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Michelin Alpin 7 ranks higher on average than the Goodride Z507.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Michelin Alpin 7 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodride Z507 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Michelin Alpin 7 ranks better than the Goodride Z507.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Goodride Z507 appears in 1 independent tests, Michelin Alpin 7 in 5.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →