Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodride SA37 and Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco appear in 7 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Goodride SA37 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 5 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco is the stronger all-round choice, leading in noise / comfort and Tire Lab Score. The Goodride SA37 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
Choose Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco if
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Goodride SA37 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 5 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 9.2 | 11.6 |
| Latest test | 2022 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 82.4 | 83.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Goodride SA37
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Goodride SA37 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 8.3 1 | Avg rank 10.3 4 | Goodride SA37 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 9.2 1 | Avg rank 15.9 | Goodride SA37 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 10.2 | Avg rank 4.3 21 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 6.5 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.0 1 | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
💧 Wet: Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride SA37 wins this category with an average rank of 8.3, compared to 10.3 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.
☀️ Dry: Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride SA37 wins this category with an average rank of 9.2, compared to 15.9 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to 10.2 for the Goodride SA37.
📏 Mileage: Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to no data for the Goodride SA37.
🔋 Efficiency: Goodride SA37 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 6.0 for the Goodride SA37.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Goodride SA37 or Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodride SA37 ranks higher on average than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Goodride SA37 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco ranks better than the Goodride SA37.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco shows better mileage performance than the Goodride SA37.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Goodride SA37 appears in 2 independent tests, Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco in 5.
Also compare
Goodride SA37 vs…
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →