TopTire Review

    Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    2026 test data · 35 independent tests · 4 head-to-head

    → See full Continental vs Goodride brand comparison

    Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental PremiumContact 7 and Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco appear in 35 tests, 4 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Continental PremiumContact 7 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 94/100, based on 30 tests.

    How the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 5 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco still wins on noise / comfort, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    Choose Continental PremiumContact 7 if

    Overall winner
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Choose Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco if

    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Test profile

    MetricContinental PremiumContact 7Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeSummerSummer
    Tests used305
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank4.911.6
    Latest test20262025
    Tire Lab Score93.583.6

    Tire Lab Score

    93.5
    Excellent · Summer
    83.6
    Very Good · Summer

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryContinental PremiumContact 7Goodride Z 107 ZuperEcoWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 4.5
    34109
    Avg rank 10.3
    4
    Continental PremiumContact 7
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 4.1
    2278
    Avg rank 15.9
    Continental PremiumContact 7
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 6.0
    2
    		No data
    Continental PremiumContact 7
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 4.9
    10129
    Avg rank 4.3
    21
    Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 5.9
    17
    Avg rank 6.5
    Continental PremiumContact 7
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 5.9
    263
    Avg rank 3.3
    2
    Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 4 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 10.3 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    ☀️ Dry: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 wins this category with an average rank of 4.1, compared to 15.9 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    ❄️ Snow: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to no data for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to 4.9 for the Continental PremiumContact 7.

    📏 Mileage: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 wins this category with an average rank of 5.9, compared to 6.5 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    🔋 Efficiency: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

    The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 5.9 for the Continental PremiumContact 7.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Continental PremiumContact 7 or Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 ranks higher on average than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental PremiumContact 7 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco ranks better than the Continental PremiumContact 7.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental PremiumContact 7 shows better mileage performance than the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Continental PremiumContact 7 appears in 30 independent tests, Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco in 5, with 4 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →