Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 and Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus appear in 15 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 performs. It takes the win in dry, ice, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 93/100, based on 12 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Choose Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Performance Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 3 | 12 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2023 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.3 | 92.8 |
Tire Lab Score
Gislaved Nord Frost 200
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 6.0 1 | Avg rank 5.8 426 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 5.7 1 | Avg rank 7.5 21 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 4.7 11 | Avg rank 4.3 444 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 5.0 | Avg rank 7.0 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Avg rank 6.7 41 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 7.8 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 9.6 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
💧 Wet: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 6.0 for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
☀️ Dry: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 7.5 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.
❄️ Snow: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to 4.7 for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
🧊 Ice: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 7.0 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 6.7 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.
📏 Mileage: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.8, compared to no data for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
🔋 Efficiency: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 9.6 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Gislaved Nord Frost 200 or Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus ranks higher on average than the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 ranks better than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus shows better mileage performance than the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Gislaved Nord Frost 200 appears in 3 independent tests, Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus in 12.
Also compare
Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs…
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →