Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 appear in 14 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performs. It takes the win in dry, ice, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 11 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in dry and Tire Lab Score. The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Choose Kumho Winter Craft WP52 if
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 3 | 11 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.2 | 10.5 |
| Latest test | 2021 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.3 | 91.9 |
Tire Lab Score
Gislaved Nord Frost 200
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 6.0 1 | Avg rank 9.1 14 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 5.7 1 | Avg rank 4.7 311 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 4.7 11 | Avg rank 12.7 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 5.0 | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 4.5 1 | Avg rank 9.2 112 | Gislaved Nord Frost 200 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 8.7 2 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 4.7 1 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
💧 Wet: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 9.1 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
☀️ Dry: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 5.7 for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
❄️ Snow: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 12.7 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
🧊 Ice: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 5.0 for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Gislaved Nord Frost 200 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 9.2 for the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
📏 Mileage: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 8.7, compared to no data for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
🔋 Efficiency: Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 6.0 for the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Gislaved Nord Frost 200 or Kumho Winter Craft WP52?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 ranks higher on average than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 ranks better than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 shows better mileage performance than the Gislaved Nord Frost 200.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Gislaved Nord Frost 200 appears in 3 independent tests, Kumho Winter Craft WP52 in 11.
Also compare
Gislaved Nord Frost 200 vs…
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →