Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    2026 test data · 42 independent tests · 3 head-to-head

    → See full Continental vs Goodyear brand comparison

    Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus appear in 42 tests, 3 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 30 tests.

    How the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus performs. It takes the win in snow, ice, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 93/100, based on 12 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in snow and Tire Lab Score. The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise ice
    • You prioritise mileage

    Test profile

    MetricContinental WinterContact TS 870 PGoodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
    SegmentPerformance WinterPerformance Winter
    TypeWinterWinter
    Tests used3012
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank5.86.8
    Latest test20252023
    Tire Lab Score90.192.8

    Tire Lab Score

    90.1
    Excellent · Winter
    92.8
    Excellent · Winter

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 870 PGoodyear UltraGrip Performance PlusWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 5.2
    61413
    Avg rank 5.8
    426
    Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 4.2
    988
    Avg rank 7.5
    21
    Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 5.6
    2812
    Avg rank 4.3
    444
    Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 10.5
    1
    Avg rank 7.0
    Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 5.6
    5310
    Avg rank 6.7
    41
    Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 10.8
    2
    Avg rank 7.8
    Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 10.1
    Avg rank 9.6
    Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 3 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to 5.8 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.

    ☀️ Dry: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to 7.5 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.

    ❄️ Snow: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to 5.6 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

    🧊 Ice: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to 10.5 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to 6.7 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.

    📏 Mileage: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.8, compared to 10.8 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

    🔋 Efficiency: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

    The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus wins this category with an average rank of 9.6, compared to 10.1 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Continental WinterContact TS 870 P or Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ranks higher on average than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ranks better than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus shows better mileage performance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Continental WinterContact TS 870 P appears in 30 independent tests, Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus in 12, with 3 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →