Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 appear in 30 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 30 tests.
How the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prefer the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Performance Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 30 | 0 |
| Best rank | #1 | — |
| Avg rank | 5.8 | — |
| Latest test | 2025 | — |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.1 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.2 61413 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.2 988 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 5.6 2812 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 10.5 1 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.6 5310 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.8 2 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 10.1 | No data | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
💧 Wet: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
☀️ Dry: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
❄️ Snow: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
🧊 Ice: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 10.5, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
📏 Mileage: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 10.8, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 10.1, compared to no data for the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental WinterContact TS 870 P or Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ranks higher on average than the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P averages a better dry-braking rank than the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ranks better than the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P shows better mileage performance than the Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P appears in 30 independent tests, Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 in 0.
Also compare
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs…
Hankook WiNter i*cept evo2/W320 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
