Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 appear in 53 tests, 18 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P performs. It takes the win in dry, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 30 tests.
How the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, ice, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 23 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Choose Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
Test profile
| Metric | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Performance Winter | Performance Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 30 | 23 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.8 | 5.3 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.1 | 95.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.2 61413 | Avg rank 4.5 13179 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.2 988 | Avg rank 4.3 5411 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 5.6 2812 | Avg rank 4.7 1287 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 10.5 1 | Avg rank 8.8 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.6 5310 | Avg rank 6.1 633 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.8 2 | Avg rank 7.3 231 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 10.1 | Avg rank 5.3 112 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 18 independent tests:
- 20252025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 AMS Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test
- 20252025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
- 20242024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test
- 20242024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test
- 20242024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test
💧 Wet: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 5.2 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
☀️ Dry: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to 4.3 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
❄️ Snow: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 5.6 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
🧊 Ice: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 wins this category with an average rank of 8.8, compared to 10.5 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to 6.1 for the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
📏 Mileage: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 wins this category with an average rank of 7.3, compared to 10.8 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 wins this category with an average rank of 5.3, compared to 10.1 for the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental WinterContact TS 870 P or Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 ranks higher on average than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ranks better than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 shows better mileage performance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P appears in 30 independent tests, Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 in 23, with 18 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs…
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →