Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow and Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 appear in 2 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
How the Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 68/100, based on 2 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow and Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prefer the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow's brand, sizing or price
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 0 | 2 |
| Best rank | — | #1 |
| Avg rank | — | 22.9 |
| Latest test | — | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | — | 68.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | No data | Avg rank 26.3 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| ☀️Dry | No data | Avg rank 22.0 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| ❄️Snow | No data | Avg rank 26.5 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| 🧊Ice | No data | Avg rank 29.0 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 16.0 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 15.5 1 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 4.0 | Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 |
💧 Wet: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 26.3, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
☀️ Dry: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 22.0, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
❄️ Snow: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 26.5, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
🧊 Ice: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 29.0, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 16.0, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
📏 Mileage: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 15.5, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs Nankang Winter Activa SV 4
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to no data for the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow or Nankang Winter Activa SV 4?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 ranks higher on average than the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 ranks better than the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 shows better mileage performance than the Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow appears in 0 independent tests, Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 in 2.
Also compare
Continental CROSSCONTACT RX-Snow vs…
Nankang Winter Activa SV 4 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →