Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact and Lanvigator Catchfors AS appear in 30 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
How the Lanvigator Catchfors AS performs. It takes the win in dry. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental AllSeasonContact and Lanvigator Catchfors AS are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise dry
Test profile
| Metric | Continental AllSeasonContact | Lanvigator Catchfors AS |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 29 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #7 |
| Avg rank | 5.4 | 15.3 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2023 |
| Tire Lab Score | 89.6 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Lanvigator Catchfors AS
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Lanvigator Catchfors AS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Avg rank 21.0 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 7.1 152 | Avg rank 7.0 | Lanvigator Catchfors AS |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 1.3 21 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.8 267 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.7 1 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.6 1 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 21.0 for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Lanvigator Catchfors AS wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to 7.1 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 8.6, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact or Lanvigator Catchfors AS?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Lanvigator Catchfors AS averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental AllSeasonContact across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact shows better mileage performance than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental AllSeasonContact appears in 29 independent tests, Lanvigator Catchfors AS in 1.
Also compare
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Lanvigator Catchfors AS vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →