TopTire Review

    Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    2026 test data · 20 independent tests · 1 head-to-head

    → See full Continental vs Lanvigator brand comparison

    Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Lanvigator Catchfors AS appear in 20 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 19 tests.

    How the Lanvigator Catchfors AS performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Lanvigator Catchfors AS are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    Choose Continental AllSeasonContact 2 if

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Choose Lanvigator Catchfors AS if

    • You prefer the Lanvigator Catchfors AS's brand, sizing or price

    Test profile

    MetricContinental AllSeasonContact 2Lanvigator Catchfors AS
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used191
    Best rank#1#7
    Avg rank5.215.3
    Latest test20262023
    Tire Lab Score91.2—

    Tire Lab Score

    91.2
    Excellent · All Season
    No score yet

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryContinental AllSeasonContact 2Lanvigator Catchfors ASWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 4.8
    101010
    Avg rank 21.0
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 5.7
    293
    Avg rank 7.0
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 4.6
    159
    		No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 5.7
    11
    		No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 4.4
    3105
    		No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 5.0
    12
    		No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 8.2
    1
    		No data
    Continental AllSeasonContact 2

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:

    💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.8, compared to 21.0 for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    ☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 7.0 for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    ❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.6, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Lanvigator Catchfors AS

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 wins this category with an average rank of 8.2, compared to no data for the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or Lanvigator Catchfors AS?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks higher on average than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ranks better than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shows better mileage performance than the Lanvigator Catchfors AS.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Continental AllSeasonContact 2 appears in 19 independent tests, Lanvigator Catchfors AS in 1, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →