BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus and Continental AllSeasonContact appear in 31 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus performs. It takes the win in dry, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, ice, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in dry and Tire Lab Score. The Continental AllSeasonContact still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus if
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus | Continental AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UHP | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 2 | 29 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 91.3 | 89.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus | Continental AllSeasonContact | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.3 1 | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.5 | Avg rank 7.1 152 | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 5.5 | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 1.3 21 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 7.2 | Avg rank 5.8 267 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 6.7 1 | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 8.6 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 5.3 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 7.1 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 5.5 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to 3.0 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 7.2 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 6.7 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 8.6, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus or Continental AllSeasonContact?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental AllSeasonContact across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus shows better mileage performance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus appears in 2 independent tests, Continental AllSeasonContact in 29.
Also compare
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs…
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →