BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    2026 test data · 6 independent tests · 2 head-to-head

    → See full BFGoodrich vs Continental brand comparison

    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus and Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS appear in 6 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 2 tests.

    How the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 4 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prefer the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus's brand, sizing or price
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Test profile

    MetricBFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS PlusContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    SegmentUHPUHP
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used24
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank5.23.2
    Latest test20242025
    Tire Lab Score91.395.3

    Tire Lab Score

    91.3
    Excellent · All Season
    95.3
    Excellent · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryBFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS PlusContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUSWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 5.3
    1
    Avg rank 3.5
    231
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 4.5
    Avg rank 3.2
    241
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 5.5
    Avg rank 3.3
    32
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    Avg rank 1.0
    1
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 7.2
    Avg rank 3.3
    71
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 6.0
    Avg rank 1.0
    1
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    🔋EfficiencyNo data
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 2 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 3.5, compared to 5.3 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    ☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 4.5 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    ❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 5.5 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 3.0 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 3.3, compared to 7.2 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 6.0 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus or Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS ranks better than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus appears in 2 independent tests, Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS in 4, with 2 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →