BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Kumho Solus 4S HA32 appear in 11 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 6 tests.
How the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 5 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in noise / comfort and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Choose Kumho Solus 4S HA32 if
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 6 | 5 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 8.4 | 10.8 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2022 |
| Tire Lab Score | 85.5 | 89.5 |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.5 11 | Avg rank 10.8 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.3 1 | Avg rank 11.7 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.6 121 | Avg rank 9.0 | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 7.0 | No data | BFGoodrich Advantage All Season |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 8.9 | Avg rank 7.8 1 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.8 | Avg rank 7.5 1 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 11.8 | Avg rank 5.0 1 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 9.5, compared to 10.8 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to 11.7 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 3.6, compared to 9.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to no data for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 wins this category with an average rank of 7.8, compared to 8.9 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 wins this category with an average rank of 7.5, compared to 10.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 11.8 for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich Advantage All Season or Kumho Solus 4S HA32?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season ranks higher on average than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 ranks better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season appears in 6 independent tests, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 in 5.
Also compare
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs…
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
