BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Ecsta PA51

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Kumho Ecsta PA51: the full picture

This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Kumho Ecsta PA51 appear in 7 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

How the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season performs. It takes the win in snow, ice, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 6 tests.

How the Kumho Ecsta PA51 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 1 test.

What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.