Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Sava Eskimo HP2 and Uniroyal MS Plus 77 appear in 21 tests, 6 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Sava Eskimo HP2 performs. It takes the win in snow, ice, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 10 tests.
How the Uniroyal MS Plus 77 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 11 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Sava Eskimo HP2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in snow and Tire Lab Score. The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Sava Eskimo HP2 if
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 10 | 11 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 14.4 | 10.5 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2021 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90 | 88 |
Tire Lab Score
Sava Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 19.2 1 | Avg rank 10.7 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 15.7 | Avg rank 11.8 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 7.1 22 | Avg rank 9.5 13 | Sava Eskimo HP2 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 9.0 | Sava Eskimo HP2 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 9.6 2 | Avg rank 9.3 2 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 7.0 | Avg rank 12.2 | Sava Eskimo HP2 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 16.3 | Avg rank 10.3 | Uniroyal MS Plus 77 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 6 independent tests:
💧 Wet: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 wins this category with an average rank of 10.7, compared to 19.2 for the Sava Eskimo HP2.
☀️ Dry: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 wins this category with an average rank of 11.8, compared to 15.7 for the Sava Eskimo HP2.
❄️ Snow: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Sava Eskimo HP2 wins this category with an average rank of 7.1, compared to 9.5 for the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.
🧊 Ice: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Sava Eskimo HP2 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 9.0 for the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 wins this category with an average rank of 9.3, compared to 9.6 for the Sava Eskimo HP2.
📏 Mileage: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Sava Eskimo HP2 wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to 12.2 for the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.
🔋 Efficiency: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs Uniroyal MS Plus 77
The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 wins this category with an average rank of 10.3, compared to 16.3 for the Sava Eskimo HP2.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Sava Eskimo HP2 or Uniroyal MS Plus 77?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Uniroyal MS Plus 77 ranks higher on average than the Sava Eskimo HP2.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Uniroyal MS Plus 77 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Sava Eskimo HP2 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Uniroyal MS Plus 77 ranks better than the Sava Eskimo HP2.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Sava Eskimo HP2 shows better mileage performance than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Sava Eskimo HP2 appears in 10 independent tests, Uniroyal MS Plus 77 in 11, with 6 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Sava Eskimo HP2 vs…
Uniroyal MS Plus 77 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →