GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo and Kleber Krisalp HP3 appear in 23 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo performs. It takes the win in wet, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Kleber Krisalp HP3 performs. It takes the win in dry, snow, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 89/100, based on 20 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Kleber Krisalp HP3 still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo | Kleber Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 3 | 20 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 10.9 | 10.2 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 90.5 | 89.2 |
Tire Lab Score
GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo
Kleber Krisalp HP3
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo | Kleber Krisalp HP3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 10.0 | Avg rank 11.0 2 | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 15.0 | Avg rank 11.8 1 | Kleber Krisalp HP3 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 7.0 1 | Avg rank 5.1 776 | Kleber Krisalp HP3 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 9.0 | Avg rank 15.5 | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 8.8 1 | Avg rank 10.2 141 | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 10.0 1 | Avg rank 13.2 | GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 9.0 | Avg rank 8.3 1 | Kleber Krisalp HP3 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 2 independent tests:
💧 Wet: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo wins this category with an average rank of 10.0, compared to 11.0 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
☀️ Dry: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 wins this category with an average rank of 11.8, compared to 15.0 for the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo.
❄️ Snow: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 7.0 for the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo.
🧊 Ice: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo wins this category with an average rank of 9.0, compared to 15.5 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo wins this category with an average rank of 8.8, compared to 10.2 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
📏 Mileage: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo wins this category with an average rank of 10.0, compared to 13.2 for the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
🔋 Efficiency: GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 wins this category with an average rank of 8.3, compared to 9.0 for the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo or Kleber Krisalp HP3?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo ranks higher on average than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 averages a better dry-braking rank than the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo ranks better than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo shows better mileage performance than the Kleber Krisalp HP3.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo appears in 3 independent tests, Kleber Krisalp HP3 in 20, with 2 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo vs…
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →