Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R

    2026 test data · 19 independent tests

    → See full Goodyear vs Toyo brand comparison

    Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Toyo R888 R appear in 19 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 16 tests.

    How the Toyo R888 R performs. It takes the win in dry. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 3 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Toyo R888 R is the stronger all-round choice, leading in dry and Tire Lab Score. The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Choose Toyo R888 R if

    Overall winner
    • You prioritise dry

    Test profile

    MetricGoodyear Eagle F1 SuperSportToyo R888 R
    SegmentUUHP/TrackUUHP/Track
    TypeSummerSummer
    Tests used163
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank4.74.2
    Latest test20262017
    Tire Lab Score85.485.5

    Tire Lab Score

    85.4
    Very Good · Summer
    85.5
    Very Good · Summer

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 SuperSportToyo R888 RWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 4.5
    5412
    Avg rank 5.8
    Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 4.8
    76
    Avg rank 3.2
    31
    Toyo R888 R
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 5.2
    831
    No data
    Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 2.9
    721
    No data
    Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

    💧 Wet: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R

    The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 5.8 for the Toyo R888 R.

    ☀️ Dry: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R

    The Toyo R888 R wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 4.8 for the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R

    The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 5.2, compared to no data for the Toyo R888 R.

    🔋 Efficiency: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Toyo R888 R

    The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport wins this category with an average rank of 2.9, compared to no data for the Toyo R888 R.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport or Toyo R888 R?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport ranks higher on average than the Toyo R888 R.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Toyo R888 R averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport ranks better than the Toyo R888 R.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport appears in 16 independent tests, Toyo R888 R in 3.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →