Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Goodride SA57 and Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco appear in 7 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Goodride SA57 performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 81/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 5 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Goodride SA57 still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise efficiency
Choose Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Goodride SA57 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 5 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 16.5 | 11.6 |
| Latest test | 2022 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 80.5 | 83.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Goodride SA57
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Goodride SA57 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 16.6 | Avg rank 10.3 4 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 18.3 | Avg rank 15.9 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 11.5 | Avg rank 4.3 21 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 20.0 | Avg rank 6.5 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 2.0 1 | Avg rank 3.3 2 | Goodride SA57 |
💧 Wet: Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 10.3, compared to 16.6 for the Goodride SA57.
☀️ Dry: Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 15.9, compared to 18.3 for the Goodride SA57.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 4.3, compared to 11.5 for the Goodride SA57.
📏 Mileage: Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to 20.0 for the Goodride SA57.
🔋 Efficiency: Goodride SA57 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
The Goodride SA57 wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to 3.3 for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Goodride SA57 or Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco ranks higher on average than the Goodride SA57.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco averages a better dry-braking rank than the Goodride SA57 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco ranks better than the Goodride SA57.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco shows better mileage performance than the Goodride SA57.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Goodride SA57 appears in 2 independent tests, Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco in 5.
Also compare
Goodride SA57 vs…
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →