Continental Race Attack Comp vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental Race Attack Comp and Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R appear in 9 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental Race Attack Comp performs. It takes the win in dry. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
How the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R performs. It takes the win in wet, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 8 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental Race Attack Comp and Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Continental Race Attack Comp | Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UUHP/Track | UUHP/Track |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 1 | 8 |
| Best rank | #2 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 3.0 | 4.2 |
| Latest test | 2020 | 2022 |
| Tire Lab Score | — | 84.2 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental Race Attack Comp
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental Race Attack Comp | Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | No data | Avg rank 5.9 213 | Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 2.0 1 | Avg rank 2.8 723 | Continental Race Attack Comp |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 4.2 22 | Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 1.0 2 | Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R |
💧 Wet: Continental Race Attack Comp vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
The Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R wins this category with an average rank of 5.9, compared to no data for the Continental Race Attack Comp.
☀️ Dry: Continental Race Attack Comp vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
The Continental Race Attack Comp wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to 2.8 for the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental Race Attack Comp vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
The Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to no data for the Continental Race Attack Comp.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental Race Attack Comp vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
The Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to no data for the Continental Race Attack Comp.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental Race Attack Comp or Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R ranks higher on average than the Continental Race Attack Comp.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental Race Attack Comp averages a better dry-braking rank than the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R ranks better than the Continental Race Attack Comp.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental Race Attack Comp appears in 1 independent tests, Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R in 8.
Also compare
Continental Race Attack Comp vs…
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →