Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Continental AllSeasonContact and Nokian SeasonProof appear in 37 tests, 8 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, ice, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
How the Nokian SeasonProof performs. It takes the win in mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 8 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Nokian SeasonProof is the stronger all-round choice, leading in mileage and Tire Lab Score. The Continental AllSeasonContact still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise ice
Choose Nokian SeasonProof if
- You prioritise mileage
- You prioritise efficiency
Test profile
| Metric | Continental AllSeasonContact | Nokian SeasonProof |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 29 | 8 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.4 | 7.3 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 89.6 | 91.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Nokian SeasonProof
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Nokian SeasonProof | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | Avg rank 8.0 12 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 7.1 152 | Avg rank 9.1 21 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | Avg rank 3.2 651 | Tie |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 1.3 21 | No data | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.8 267 | Avg rank 6.4 213 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.7 1 | Avg rank 4.7 1 | Nokian SeasonProof |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 8.6 1 | Avg rank 8.0 | Nokian SeasonProof |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 8 independent tests:
- 20242024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test
- 20222022 All Season Tyre Market Overview
- 20222022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test
- 20212021 AZ All Season Tyre Test
- 20212021 All Season Tyre Market Overview
- 20212021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test
- 20212021 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test
- 20202020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test
💧 Wet: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 8.0 for the Nokian SeasonProof.
☀️ Dry: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 7.1, compared to 9.1 for the Nokian SeasonProof.
❄️ Snow: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
Both tires perform similarly in snow, with average ranks of 3.2 and 3.2.
🧊 Ice: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to no data for the Nokian SeasonProof.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 6.4 for the Nokian SeasonProof.
📏 Mileage: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Nokian SeasonProof wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 6.7 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
🔋 Efficiency: Continental AllSeasonContact vs Nokian SeasonProof
The Nokian SeasonProof wins this category with an average rank of 8.0, compared to 8.6 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Continental AllSeasonContact or Nokian SeasonProof?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks higher on average than the Nokian SeasonProof.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Continental AllSeasonContact averages a better dry-braking rank than the Nokian SeasonProof across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Continental AllSeasonContact ranks better than the Nokian SeasonProof.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Nokian SeasonProof shows better mileage performance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Continental AllSeasonContact appears in 29 independent tests, Nokian SeasonProof in 8, with 8 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Nokian SeasonProof vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
