BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus and Falken Azenis FK460 AS appear in 5 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus performs. It takes the win in ice. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Falken Azenis FK460 AS performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 93/100, based on 3 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus still wins on ice, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise ice
Choose Falken Azenis FK460 AS if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UHP | UHP |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 2 | 3 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 5.2 | 3.9 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 91.3 | 93.3 |
Tire Lab Score
Falken Azenis FK460 AS
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus | Falken Azenis FK460 AS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 5.3 1 | Avg rank 3.4 114 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.5 | Avg rank 3.9 31 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 5.5 | Avg rank 3.2 4 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Avg rank 9.0 | BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 7.2 | Avg rank 4.2 13 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 6.0 | Avg rank 3.0 1 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 1.0 1 | Falken Azenis FK460 AS |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 2 independent tests:
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 3.4, compared to 5.3 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 3.9, compared to 4.5 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 5.5 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 9.0 for the Falken Azenis FK460 AS.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to 7.2 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 6.0 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK460 AS
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus or Falken Azenis FK460 AS?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS ranks higher on average than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Falken Azenis FK460 AS averages a better dry-braking rank than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS ranks better than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Falken Azenis FK460 AS shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus appears in 2 independent tests, Falken Azenis FK460 AS in 3, with 2 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs…
Falken Azenis FK460 AS vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →