BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    2026 test data · 17 independent tests

    → See full BFGoodrich vs Falken brand comparison

    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus and Falken Azenis FK520 appear in 17 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 91/100, based on 2 tests.

    How the Falken Azenis FK520 performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 89/100, based on 15 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Falken Azenis FK520 still wins on noise / comfort, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Test profile

    MetricBFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS PlusFalken Azenis FK520
    SegmentUHPUHP
    TypeAll SeasonSummer
    Tests used215
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank5.26.6
    Latest test20242026
    Tire Lab Score91.388.5

    Tire Lab Score

    91.3
    Excellent · All Season
    88.5
    Very Good · Summer

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryBFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS PlusFalken Azenis FK520Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 5.3
    1
    Avg rank 6.9
    424
    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 4.5
    Avg rank 6.0
    452
    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 5.5
    No data
    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus
    🧊Ice
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    No data
    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 7.2
    Avg rank 6.3
    34
    Falken Azenis FK520
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 6.0
    Avg rank 8.6
    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus
    🔋EfficiencyNo data
    Avg rank 6.1
    3
    Falken Azenis FK520

    💧 Wet: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.3, compared to 6.9 for the Falken Azenis FK520.

    ☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 6.0 for the Falken Azenis FK520.

    ❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to no data for the Falken Azenis FK520.

    🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to no data for the Falken Azenis FK520.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to 7.2 for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 8.6 for the Falken Azenis FK520.

    🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus vs Falken Azenis FK520

    The Falken Azenis FK520 wins this category with an average rank of 6.1, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus or Falken Azenis FK520?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus ranks higher on average than the Falken Azenis FK520.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus averages a better dry-braking rank than the Falken Azenis FK520 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Falken Azenis FK520 ranks better than the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus shows better mileage performance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus appears in 2 independent tests, Falken Azenis FK520 in 15.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →