BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 and Continental AllSeasonContact appear in 31 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Continental AllSeasonContact performs. It takes the win in ice, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 29 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Continental AllSeasonContact is the stronger all-round choice, leading in ice and Tire Lab Score. The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact if
- You prioritise ice
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | All Terrain | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 2 | 29 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 3.4 | 5.4 |
| Latest test | — | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 87.9 | 89.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Continental AllSeasonContact
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Continental AllSeasonContact | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 4.4 21 | Avg rank 5.1 6109 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.4 11 | Avg rank 7.1 152 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 2.2 311 | Avg rank 3.2 14169 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 |
| 🧊Ice | No data | Avg rank 1.3 21 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 2.6 4 | Avg rank 5.8 267 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 |
| 📏Mileage | No data | Avg rank 6.7 1 | Continental AllSeasonContact |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 1.0 1 | Avg rank 8.6 1 | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 |
💧 Wet: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to 5.1 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
☀️ Dry: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.4, compared to 7.1 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
❄️ Snow: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.2, compared to 3.2 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
🧊 Ice: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 1.3, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.6, compared to 5.8 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
📏 Mileage: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The Continental AllSeasonContact wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to no data for the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2.
🔋 Efficiency: BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 8.6 for the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 or Continental AllSeasonContact?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 ranks higher on average than the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Continental AllSeasonContact across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 ranks better than the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Continental AllSeasonContact shows better mileage performance than the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 appears in 2 independent tests, Continental AllSeasonContact in 29.
Also compare
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs…
Continental AllSeasonContact vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →