Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257

    2026 test data · 1 independent tests

    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 and Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257 appear in 1 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 82/100, based on 1 test.

    How the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 and Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257 are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prefer the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257's brand, sizing or price

    Test profile

    MetricTriangle EffeX SUV TS 601Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257
    SegmentTouringSummer
    TypeSummerSummer
    Tests used10
    Best rank#1
    Avg rank7.0
    Latest test2025
    Tire Lab Score82.2

    Tire Lab Score

    82.2
    Very Good · Summer
    No score yet

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryTriangle EffeX SUV TS 601Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 6.3
    1
    No data
    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 8.0
    No data
    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 5.5
    1
    No data
    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    No data
    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601

    💧 Wet: Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 wins this category with an average rank of 6.3, compared to no data for the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    ☀️ Dry: Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 wins this category with an average rank of 8.0, compared to no data for the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to no data for the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    🔋 Efficiency: Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to no data for the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 or Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 ranks higher on average than the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 ranks better than the Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 appears in 1 independent tests, Triangle SAPPHIRE TR257 in 0.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →