Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Radar Dimax Alpine and Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow appear in 7 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Radar Dimax Alpine performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.
How the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Radar Dimax Alpine and Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prefer the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Radar Dimax Alpine | Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring Winter | Touring Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 6 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #18 |
| Avg rank | 17.0 | 30.0 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2025 |
| Tire Lab Score | 87.9 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Radar Dimax Alpine
Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Radar Dimax Alpine | Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 23.4 | Avg rank 34.0 | Radar Dimax Alpine |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 6.5 | No data | Radar Dimax Alpine |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 7.2 111 | No data | Radar Dimax Alpine |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 5.5 1 | No data | Radar Dimax Alpine |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 1.0 1 | No data | Radar Dimax Alpine |
💧 Wet: Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 23.4, compared to 34.0 for the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
☀️ Dry: Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 6.5, compared to no data for the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
❄️ Snow: Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 7.2, compared to no data for the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to no data for the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
🔋 Efficiency: Radar Dimax Alpine vs Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow
The Radar Dimax Alpine wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to no data for the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Radar Dimax Alpine or Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Radar Dimax Alpine ranks higher on average than the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Radar Dimax Alpine averages a better dry-braking rank than the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Radar Dimax Alpine ranks better than the Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Radar Dimax Alpine appears in 6 independent tests, Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow in 1.
Also compare
Radar Dimax Alpine vs…
Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
