Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    2026 test data · 4 independent tests

    → See full Nokian vs Zeetex brand comparison

    Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Nokian WR SUV 4 and Zeetex WH1000 SUV appear in 4 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Nokian WR SUV 4 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 3 tests.

    How the Zeetex WH1000 SUV performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 and Zeetex WH1000 SUV are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prefer the Zeetex WH1000 SUV's brand, sizing or price

    Test profile

    MetricNokian WR SUV 4Zeetex WH1000 SUV
    SegmentSUV WinterSUV Winter
    TypeWinterWinter
    Tests used31
    Best rank#1#9
    Avg rank6.038.3
    Latest test20212022
    Tire Lab Score89.8

    Tire Lab Score

    89.8
    Very Good · Winter
    No score yet

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryNokian WR SUV 4Zeetex WH1000 SUVWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 6.2
    1
    Avg rank 48.0
    Nokian WR SUV 4
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 6.0
    1
    No data
    Nokian WR SUV 4
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 5.1
    12
    No data
    Nokian WR SUV 4
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 5.5
    No data
    Nokian WR SUV 4
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 8.0
    No data
    Nokian WR SUV 4

    💧 Wet: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 6.2, compared to 48.0 for the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    ☀️ Dry: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to no data for the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    ❄️ Snow: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to no data for the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to no data for the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    🔋 Efficiency: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs Zeetex WH1000 SUV

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 wins this category with an average rank of 8.0, compared to no data for the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Nokian WR SUV 4 or Zeetex WH1000 SUV?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Nokian WR SUV 4 ranks higher on average than the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Nokian WR SUV 4 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Zeetex WH1000 SUV across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Nokian WR SUV 4 ranks better than the Zeetex WH1000 SUV.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Nokian WR SUV 4 appears in 3 independent tests, Zeetex WH1000 SUV in 1.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →