Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Minerva Radial F 205 and Nokian Hakka Blue 2 appear in 7 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Minerva Radial F 205 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 77/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Nokian Hakka Blue 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 5 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Minerva Radial F 205 making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prefer the Minerva Radial F 205's brand, sizing or price
Choose Nokian Hakka Blue 2 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
Test profile
| Metric | Minerva Radial F 205 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 5 |
| Best rank | #6 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 35.1 | 3.8 |
| Latest test | 2023 | 2021 |
| Tire Lab Score | 77.4 | 88 |
Tire Lab Score
Minerva Radial F 205
Nokian Hakka Blue 2
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Minerva Radial F 205 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 39.5 | Avg rank 4.2 131 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 41.0 | Avg rank 4.0 121 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
| ❄️Snow | No data | Avg rank 3.5 1 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 2.8 221 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 2.7 2 | Nokian Hakka Blue 2 |
💧 Wet: Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.2, compared to 39.5 for the Minerva Radial F 205.
☀️ Dry: Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to 41.0 for the Minerva Radial F 205.
❄️ Snow: Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 wins this category with an average rank of 3.5, compared to no data for the Minerva Radial F 205.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.8, compared to no data for the Minerva Radial F 205.
🔋 Efficiency: Minerva Radial F 205 vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.7, compared to no data for the Minerva Radial F 205.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Minerva Radial F 205 or Nokian Hakka Blue 2?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Nokian Hakka Blue 2 ranks higher on average than the Minerva Radial F 205.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Nokian Hakka Blue 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Minerva Radial F 205 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Nokian Hakka Blue 2 ranks better than the Minerva Radial F 205.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Minerva Radial F 205 appears in 2 independent tests, Nokian Hakka Blue 2 in 5.
Also compare
Minerva Radial F 205 vs…
Nokian Hakka Blue 2 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
