Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus appear in 6 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
How the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 6 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prefer the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4's brand, sizing or price
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Summer | Touring |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 0 | 6 |
| Best rank | — | #1 |
| Avg rank | — | 7.9 |
| Latest test | — | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | — | 84.2 |
Tire Lab Score
Michelin PILOT HX MXM4
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | No data | Avg rank 7.3 11 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus |
| ☀️Dry | No data | Avg rank 9.3 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 5.3 2 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 1.8 211 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus |
💧 Wet: Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.3, compared to no data for the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
☀️ Dry: Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus wins this category with an average rank of 9.3, compared to no data for the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.3, compared to no data for the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
🔋 Efficiency: Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus wins this category with an average rank of 1.8, compared to no data for the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 or Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus ranks higher on average than the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus averages a better dry-braking rank than the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus ranks better than the Michelin PILOT HX MXM4.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 appears in 0 independent tests, Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus in 6.
Also compare
Michelin PILOT HX MXM4 vs…
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Plus vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
