Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Mabor Sport Jet 3 and Yokohama Advan Sport V105 appear in 6 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Mabor Sport Jet 3 performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 81/100, based on 2 tests.
How the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 4 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Mabor Sport Jet 3 making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
- You prefer the Mabor Sport Jet 3's brand, sizing or price
Choose Yokohama Advan Sport V105 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
Test profile
| Metric | Mabor Sport Jet 3 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | UHP | UHP |
| Type | Summer | Summer |
| Tests used | 2 | 4 |
| Best rank | #18 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 25.5 | 9.0 |
| Latest test | 2020 | 2022 |
| Tire Lab Score | 80.9 | 84.2 |
Tire Lab Score
Mabor Sport Jet 3
Yokohama Advan Sport V105
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Mabor Sport Jet 3 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 27.0 | Avg rank 10.0 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 25.5 | Avg rank 8.4 1 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | No data | Avg rank 6.9 3 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 |
| 🔋Efficiency | No data | Avg rank 1.0 2 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:
💧 Wet: Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 wins this category with an average rank of 10.0, compared to 27.0 for the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
☀️ Dry: Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 wins this category with an average rank of 8.4, compared to 25.5 for the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 wins this category with an average rank of 6.9, compared to no data for the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
🔋 Efficiency: Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to no data for the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Mabor Sport Jet 3 or Yokohama Advan Sport V105?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 ranks higher on average than the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Mabor Sport Jet 3 across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 ranks better than the Mabor Sport Jet 3.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Mabor Sport Jet 3 appears in 2 independent tests, Yokohama Advan Sport V105 in 4, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs…
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
