Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    2026 test data · 10 independent tests

    → See full Laufenn vs Yokohama brand comparison

    Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Laufenn G Fit 4S and Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 appear in 10 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Laufenn G Fit 4S performs. It takes the win in wet. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 5 tests.

    How the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 performs. It takes the win in dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 87/100, based on 5 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Laufenn G Fit 4S is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 still wins on dry, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow
    • You prioritise ice

    Test profile

    MetricLaufenn G Fit 4SYokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used55
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank13.19.8
    Latest test20252024
    Tire Lab Score89.587

    Tire Lab Score

    89.5
    Very Good · All Season
    87
    Very Good · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SYokohama BluEarth 4S AW21Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 10.4
    1
    Avg rank 10.5
    2
    Laufenn G Fit 4S
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 18.7
    Avg rank 12.7
    1
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 8.3
    Avg rank 5.0
    12
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    🧊IceNo data
    Avg rank 8.0
    1
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 8.0
    1
    Avg rank 5.4
    21
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 7.0
    Avg rank 6.7
    1
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 2.0
    1
    Avg rank 1.0
    2
    Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    💧 Wet: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Laufenn G Fit 4S wins this category with an average rank of 10.4, compared to 10.5 for the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21.

    ☀️ Dry: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 12.7, compared to 18.7 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    ❄️ Snow: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 8.3 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🧊 Ice: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 8.0, compared to no data for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 5.4, compared to 8.0 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    📏 Mileage: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 7.0 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🔋 Efficiency: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 wins this category with an average rank of 1.0, compared to 2.0 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Laufenn G Fit 4S or Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Laufenn G Fit 4S ranks higher on average than the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Laufenn G Fit 4S across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 ranks better than the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 shows better mileage performance than the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Laufenn G Fit 4S appears in 5 independent tests, Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 in 5.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →