Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    2026 test data · 21 independent tests

    → See full Laufenn vs Michelin brand comparison

    Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Laufenn G Fit 4S and Michelin CrossClimate Plus appear in 21 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Laufenn G Fit 4S performs. It takes the win in efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 5 tests.

    How the Michelin CrossClimate Plus performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 95/100, based on 16 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Laufenn G Fit 4S still wins on efficiency, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise efficiency
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Test profile

    MetricLaufenn G Fit 4SMichelin CrossClimate Plus
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used516
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank13.15.1
    Latest test20252021
    Tire Lab Score89.594.5

    Tire Lab Score

    89.5
    Very Good · All Season
    94.5
    Excellent · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SMichelin CrossClimate PlusWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 10.4
    1
    Avg rank 4.7
    453
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 18.7
    Avg rank 3.8
    1047
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 8.3
    Avg rank 5.6
    122
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    🧊IceNo data
    Avg rank 4.0
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 8.0
    1
    Avg rank 5.6
    55
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 7.0
    Avg rank 1.7
    21
    Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 2.0
    1
    Avg rank 5.5
    11
    Laufenn G Fit 4S

    💧 Wet: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to 10.4 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    ☀️ Dry: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 3.8, compared to 18.7 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    ❄️ Snow: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to 8.3 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🧊 Ice: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 4.0, compared to no data for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.6, compared to 8.0 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    📏 Mileage: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus wins this category with an average rank of 1.7, compared to 7.0 for the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    🔋 Efficiency: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate Plus

    The Laufenn G Fit 4S wins this category with an average rank of 2.0, compared to 5.5 for the Michelin CrossClimate Plus.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Laufenn G Fit 4S or Michelin CrossClimate Plus?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Michelin CrossClimate Plus ranks higher on average than the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Michelin CrossClimate Plus averages a better dry-braking rank than the Laufenn G Fit 4S across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Michelin CrossClimate Plus ranks better than the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Michelin CrossClimate Plus shows better mileage performance than the Laufenn G Fit 4S.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Laufenn G Fit 4S appears in 5 independent tests, Michelin CrossClimate Plus in 16.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →