Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 and Seiberling Seilberling Winter appear in 12 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 11 tests.
How the Seiberling Seilberling Winter performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. It has limited comparative test data, so treat its results as indicative.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 and Seiberling Seilberling Winter are closely matched. Pick based on the category that matters most to your driving — wet, dry, comfort, mileage, or price.
Which one should you buy?
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prefer the Seiberling Seilberling Winter's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | Seiberling Seilberling Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Winter | Winter |
| Type | Winter | Winter |
| Tests used | 11 | 1 |
| Best rank | #1 | #17 |
| Avg rank | 10.5 | 26.5 |
| Latest test | 2025 | 2019 |
| Tire Lab Score | 91.9 | — |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | Seiberling Seilberling Winter | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.1 14 | Avg rank 30.0 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 4.7 311 | No data | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 12.7 | Avg rank 27.0 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 4.5 1 | No data | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 9.2 112 | No data | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 8.7 2 | No data | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 4.7 1 | No data | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 |
💧 Wet: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 9.1, compared to 30.0 for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
☀️ Dry: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to no data for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
❄️ Snow: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 12.7, compared to 27.0 for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
🧊 Ice: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to no data for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 9.2, compared to no data for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
📏 Mileage: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 8.7, compared to no data for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
🔋 Efficiency: Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Seiberling Seilberling Winter
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to no data for the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Kumho Winter Craft WP52 or Seiberling Seilberling Winter?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 ranks higher on average than the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Seiberling Seilberling Winter across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 ranks better than the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 shows better mileage performance than the Seiberling Seilberling Winter.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 appears in 11 independent tests, Seiberling Seilberling Winter in 1.
Also compare
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs…
Seiberling Seilberling Winter vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
