Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21: the full picture

This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 appear in 11 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

How the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus performs. It takes the win in dry, ice. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.

How the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 performs. It takes the win in wet, snow, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 87/100, based on 5 tests.

What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.