Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver appear in 9 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort, mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 6 tests.
How the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver performs. It does not lead any single category outright in this matchup. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 78/100, based on 3 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise snow
- You prefer the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver's brand, sizing or price
Test profile
| Metric | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Touring | Touring |
| Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tests used | 6 | 3 |
| Best rank | #1 | #11 |
| Avg rank | 10.0 | 22.1 |
| Latest test | 2024 | 2024 |
| Tire Lab Score | 88.1 | 77.5 |
Tire Lab Score
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 11.0 | Avg rank 25.0 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 11.9 | Avg rank 23.0 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| ❄️Snow | Avg rank 7.3 | No data | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 🧊Ice | Avg rank 7.0 | No data | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 7.5 11 | No data | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 7.0 11 | No data | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 5.7 2 | No data | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus |
Tests used in this comparison
Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 2 independent tests:
💧 Wet: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 11.0, compared to 25.0 for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
☀️ Dry: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 11.9, compared to 23.0 for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
❄️ Snow: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.3, compared to no data for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
🧊 Ice: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to no data for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.5, compared to no data for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
📏 Mileage: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 7.0, compared to no data for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
🔋 Efficiency: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to no data for the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus or Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus ranks higher on average than the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus averages a better dry-braking rank than the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus ranks better than the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus shows better mileage performance than the Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus appears in 6 independent tests, Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver in 3, with 2 head-to-head tests where both were measured.
Also compare
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs…
Tracmax X Privilio Trac Saver vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →
