Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    2026 test data · 17 independent tests · 1 head-to-head

    → See full Kumho vs Vredestein brand comparison

    Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV and Vredestein Quatrac appear in 17 tests, 1 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 86/100, based on 1 test.

    How the Vredestein Quatrac performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 16 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Vredestein Quatrac is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV still wins on noise / comfort, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise efficiency
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Test profile

    MetricKumho Solus 4S HA31 SUVVredestein Quatrac
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used116
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank7.36.5
    Latest test20202025
    Tire Lab Score86.489.9

    Tire Lab Score

    86.4
    Very Good · All Season
    89.9
    Very Good · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryKumho Solus 4S HA31 SUVVredestein QuatracWinner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 8.0
    Avg rank 5.1
    892
    Vredestein Quatrac
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 7.0
    Avg rank 5.7
    126
    Vredestein Quatrac
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 11.0
    Avg rank 6.8
    22
    Vredestein Quatrac
    🧊IceNo data
    Avg rank 11.0
    Vredestein Quatrac
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 6.0
    1
    Avg rank 6.9
    24
    Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV
    📏MileageNo data
    Avg rank 7.2
    2
    Vredestein Quatrac
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 3.0
    1
    Avg rank 6.3
    11
    Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 1 independent test:

    💧 Wet: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Vredestein Quatrac wins this category with an average rank of 5.1, compared to 8.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    ☀️ Dry: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Vredestein Quatrac wins this category with an average rank of 5.7, compared to 7.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    ❄️ Snow: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Vredestein Quatrac wins this category with an average rank of 6.8, compared to 11.0 for the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    🧊 Ice: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Vredestein Quatrac wins this category with an average rank of 11.0, compared to no data for the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 6.9 for the Vredestein Quatrac.

    📏 Mileage: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Vredestein Quatrac wins this category with an average rank of 7.2, compared to no data for the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    🔋 Efficiency: Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac

    The Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV wins this category with an average rank of 3.0, compared to 6.3 for the Vredestein Quatrac.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV or Vredestein Quatrac?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Vredestein Quatrac ranks higher on average than the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Vredestein Quatrac averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV ranks better than the Vredestein Quatrac.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Vredestein Quatrac shows better mileage performance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Kumho Solus 4S HA31 SUV appears in 1 independent tests, Vredestein Quatrac in 16, with 1 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →