TopTire Review

    Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    2026 test data · 39 independent tests · 2 head-to-head

    → See full Kleber vs Michelin brand comparison

    Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 and Michelin CrossClimate 2 appear in 39 tests, 2 of which put both tires on the same track on the same day. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the Kleber Quadraxer 2 performs. It takes the win in mileage, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 92/100, based on 7 tests.

    How the Michelin CrossClimate 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, snow, ice, noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 90/100, based on 32 tests.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The Kleber Quadraxer 2 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in mileage and Tire Lab Score. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    Choose Kleber Quadraxer 2 if

    Overall winner
    • You prioritise mileage
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Choose Michelin CrossClimate 2 if

    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise snow

    Test profile

    MetricKleber Quadraxer 2Michelin CrossClimate 2
    SegmentTouringTouring
    TypeAll SeasonAll Season
    Tests used732
    Best rank#1#1
    Avg rank9.54.6
    Latest test20222026
    Tire Lab Score92.390.1

    Tire Lab Score

    92.3
    Excellent · All Season
    90.1
    Excellent · All Season

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryKleber Quadraxer 2Michelin CrossClimate 2Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 10.7
    11
    Avg rank 5.5
    9115
    Michelin CrossClimate 2
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 11.5
    1
    Avg rank 2.9
    22148
    Michelin CrossClimate 2
    ❄️Snow
    Avg rank 4.6
    112
    Avg rank 3.2
    271512
    Michelin CrossClimate 2
    🧊IceNo data
    Avg rank 4.7
    111
    Michelin CrossClimate 2
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 7.3
    1
    Avg rank 5.8
    255
    Michelin CrossClimate 2
    📏Mileage
    Avg rank 4.5
    1
    Avg rank 9.5
    2
    Kleber Quadraxer 2
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 6.7
    Avg rank 8.4
    23
    Kleber Quadraxer 2

    Tests used in this comparison

    Both tires were measured head-to-head in these 2 independent tests:

    💧 Wet: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.5, compared to 10.7 for the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    ☀️ Dry: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.9, compared to 11.5 for the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    ❄️ Snow: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 wins this category with an average rank of 3.2, compared to 4.6 for the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    🧊 Ice: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.7, compared to no data for the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.8, compared to 7.3 for the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    📏 Mileage: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Kleber Quadraxer 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 9.5 for the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

    🔋 Efficiency: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

    The Kleber Quadraxer 2 wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 8.4 for the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, Kleber Quadraxer 2 or Michelin CrossClimate 2?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 ranks higher on average than the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Michelin CrossClimate 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kleber Quadraxer 2 across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 ranks better than the Kleber Quadraxer 2.

    Which tire lasts longer?

    Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 shows better mileage performance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    Kleber Quadraxer 2 appears in 7 independent tests, Michelin CrossClimate 2 in 32, with 2 head-to-head tests where both were measured.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →