Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP: the full picture
This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 and Kleber Dynaxer UHP appear in 10 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.
How the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, noise / comfort, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 88/100, based on 3 tests.
How the Kleber Dynaxer UHP performs. It takes the win in mileage. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 7 tests.
What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.
Verdict
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 is the stronger all-round choice, leading in wet and Tire Lab Score. The Kleber Dynaxer UHP still wins on mileage, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.
Which one should you buy?
Choose Kleber Dynaxer HP5 if
- You prioritise wet
- You prioritise dry
- You prioritise noise / comfort
- You prioritise mileage
Test profile
| Metric | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 | Kleber Dynaxer UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | — | UHP |
| Type | — | Summer |
| Tests used | 3 | 7 |
| Best rank | #1 | #1 |
| Avg rank | 8.9 | 14.0 |
| Latest test | 2026 | 2023 |
| Tire Lab Score | 88.1 | 84.6 |
Tire Lab Score
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Performance overview
Category-by-category results
| Category | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Wet | Avg rank 9.0 | Avg rank 16.6 | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 |
| ☀️Dry | Avg rank 9.9 | Avg rank 15.2 | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 |
| 🔇Noise / Comfort | Avg rank 6.7 13 | Avg rank 9.8 1 | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 |
| 📏Mileage | Avg rank 14.0 | Avg rank 7.7 | Kleber Dynaxer UHP |
| 🔋Efficiency | Avg rank 11.0 | Avg rank 14.5 | Kleber Dynaxer HP5 |
💧 Wet: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 wins this category with an average rank of 9.0, compared to 16.6 for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
☀️ Dry: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 wins this category with an average rank of 9.9, compared to 15.2 for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
🔇 Noise / Comfort: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 wins this category with an average rank of 6.7, compared to 9.8 for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
📏 Mileage: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP wins this category with an average rank of 7.7, compared to 14.0 for the Kleber Dynaxer HP5.
🔋 Efficiency: Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Kleber Dynaxer UHP
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 wins this category with an average rank of 11.0, compared to 14.5 for the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better in the wet, Kleber Dynaxer HP5 or Kleber Dynaxer UHP?
Across independent wet-braking tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ranks higher on average than the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
Which has shorter dry braking distance?
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 averages a better dry-braking rank than the Kleber Dynaxer UHP across the tests where both appeared.
Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?
On combined noise and comfort metrics, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ranks better than the Kleber Dynaxer UHP.
Which tire lasts longer?
Based on wear and abrasion testing, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP shows better mileage performance than the Kleber Dynaxer HP5.
How many tests were used in this comparison?
Kleber Dynaxer HP5 appears in 3 independent tests, Kleber Dynaxer UHP in 7.
Also compare
Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs…
Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →