GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2

    2026 test data · 2 independent tests

    → See full GT-Radial vs Sava brand comparison

    GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2: the full picture

    This comparison is built only from published independent tests — no manufacturer claims and no sponsored reviews. Between them, the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV and Sava Intensa SUV 2 appear in 2 tests, though they have not yet met head-to-head in the same test. Head-to-head results carry the most weight here, because surface, weather and test car all change between events and make raw numbers from different tests hard to compare directly.

    How the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV performs. It takes the win in noise / comfort. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 85/100, based on 1 test.

    How the Sava Intensa SUV 2 performs. It takes the win in wet, dry, efficiency. Its overall Tire Lab Score is 84/100, based on 1 test.

    What this means for you. Category wins matter more than the overall score when your driving is weighted toward one condition — a wet-climate commuter should follow the wet braking column, while a high-mileage driver should follow wear and rolling resistance. Also check that both tires are actually offered in your size and load rating: performance can shift between sizes, and availability differs between the European and North American markets.

    Verdict

    The GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV is the stronger all-round choice, leading in noise / comfort and Tire Lab Score. The Sava Intensa SUV 2 still wins on wet, making it the right pick if that matters most to you.

    Which one should you buy?

    • You prioritise noise / comfort
    • You prioritise wet
    • You prioritise dry
    • You prioritise efficiency

    Test profile

    MetricGT-Radial SportActive 2 SUVSava Intensa SUV 2
    SegmentSUVSUV
    TypeSummerSummer
    Tests used11
    Best rank#2#1
    Avg rank7.04.9
    Latest test20232026
    Tire Lab Score8584

    Tire Lab Score

    85
    Very Good · Summer
    84
    Very Good · Summer

    Performance overview

    Category-by-category results

    CategoryGT-Radial SportActive 2 SUVSava Intensa SUV 2Winner
    💧Wet
    Avg rank 7.0
    Avg rank 5.0
    1
    Sava Intensa SUV 2
    ☀️Dry
    Avg rank 8.5
    Avg rank 4.5
    Sava Intensa SUV 2
    🔇Noise / Comfort
    Avg rank 6.0
    Avg rank 6.3
    GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV
    🔋Efficiency
    Avg rank 5.5
    Avg rank 2.5
    11
    Sava Intensa SUV 2

    💧 Wet: GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2

    The Sava Intensa SUV 2 wins this category with an average rank of 5.0, compared to 7.0 for the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV.

    ☀️ Dry: GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2

    The Sava Intensa SUV 2 wins this category with an average rank of 4.5, compared to 8.5 for the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV.

    🔇 Noise / Comfort: GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2

    The GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV wins this category with an average rank of 6.0, compared to 6.3 for the Sava Intensa SUV 2.

    🔋 Efficiency: GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV vs Sava Intensa SUV 2

    The Sava Intensa SUV 2 wins this category with an average rank of 2.5, compared to 5.5 for the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is better in the wet, GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV or Sava Intensa SUV 2?

    Across independent wet-braking tests, the Sava Intensa SUV 2 ranks higher on average than the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV.

    Which has shorter dry braking distance?

    The Sava Intensa SUV 2 averages a better dry-braking rank than the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV across the tests where both appeared.

    Which tire is quieter and more comfortable?

    On combined noise and comfort metrics, the GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV ranks better than the Sava Intensa SUV 2.

    How many tests were used in this comparison?

    GT-Radial SportActive 2 SUV appears in 1 independent tests, Sava Intensa SUV 2 in 1.

    Also compare

    Data aggregated from independent testing organizations including ADAC, Auto Bild, TCS, and Auto Motor und Sport. Read our methodology →